Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Eco-Town risk to food stuffs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 June 2008
IF the so-called "Eco-Town" at Ford is given the go-ahead, it will obliterate the high quality land suitable for growing foodstuffs.
The current development of 400 homes at Toddington has already destroyed the potential of growing glass-house and other crops.

A further proposal – not yet called an "Eco-Town", for at least 1,000 homes between Toddington and the Black Ditch (for
merly known as van Heyningen's) would similarly rob the country of a large capability to provide essential food.

We are importing more food than ever and the nation would be at serious risk if these external food sources were to be cut off!

It is surely imperative that we maximise our own resources!

Arun District Council has much experience in assessing the suitability of land for various developments and it has a unique and intimate knowledge of sites in the area.

It has expressly stated that Ford is not a suitable site for an Eco-Town.

However, the government is prepared to enforce its own, inexpert, plans on a site which has already been rejected in local district plans which were confirmed by a government inspector and by its own secretary of state!

The several "advantages" put forward by the proponents of the Ford scheme should be taken with a very large pinch of salt.

They would have no power to ensure their provision and some are just not practical. They are merely words!

It is difficult to see how the government's own definition of an Eco-Town as a "freestanding development" could possibly apply to a site surrounded by the villages of Yapton, Ford and Climping, with very serious consequences for the neighbouring towns of Littlehampton, Arundel and even Bognor.

Wilf Daggett
Barn Close, Littlehampton


NOTE: All letters must include a name and address which can be withheld by request.

-----------------------------
Click here to return to Gazette letters.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Gazette: roger.green@littlehamptongazette.co.uk



The full article contains 342 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2008 4:07 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Littlehampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

K. Chenery,

Yapton 29/06/2008 21:19:22
Well said!
When you consider that the UN has recently declared that world food production must increase by 50% over the next 12years, it makes little sense to concrete over prime agricultural land, especially when that land is sacrificed for profit and political expediency, rather than out of genuine concern for housing and the environment.

We need to use our land wisely ... they're not making any more!
nofordecotown.co.uk

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think there are too many roadworks going on in Worthing at the same time?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.